A new unit for the collection today with a return to the 16th century border warfare of Eastern Europe. These horsemen would be as equally at home in an Ottoman raiding party as they would in an army defending the eastern reaches of Christendom. The figures represent the light cavalry of the provinces of Wallachia and Moldova, the calarasi. The calarasi were made up of plainsmen or members of the lower nobility. Armed with bows and lances they made ideal scouts and couriers. They could often be found patrolling the borders of their provinces, ever vigilant against the constant threat of enemy raids.
The calarasi wore rich and bright clothing when they could afford it. Another distinctive item of clothing often worn were tall beehive shaped hats, made of lynx fur, which they decorated with feathers. There are some interesting contemporary images of these expert cavalrymen, but the images need to be treated with caution. The first image below, from around 1530, shows two "turks" from a raiding party. One of them looks to be a Wallachian or Moldovan horseman serving as an Ottoman vassal. He wears the distinctive beehive shaped fur hat and is in striped clothing. The second is from a German military manual in the University of Heidelberg. It is so similar that it may simply be a copy of the fist image by
Erhard Schön. The later 16th century images by
Abrahm de Bruyn match the clothing and hats of the first two images very closely.
|
Erhard Schön 1530 Two Turks. One of the horseman is probably a Wallachian in Turkish employ as he wears the distinctive fur hat of the calarasi. Note the striped clothing he wears.
|
|
A possible image of a calarasi horseman from "the book of the tried arts", South West Germany 1535. |
|
Abrahm de Bruyn - a Wallachian c.1585. |
|
Abrahm de Bruyn - Wallachian from the later 1500s. |
A contemporary image to Erhard
Schön's is Daniel Hopfer's etching of three "Mamluks" shown below. Rather than being mamluks this trio of horseman may well be calarasi, they certainly look very similar with the distinctive hats and striped coats. In fact so similar that it is most likely that
Schön or Hopfer has copied the other, although whose image was first is hard to tell. The later image shown below from the mid 16th century costume codex, now in Madrid, is clearly a copy of Hopfer's etching. Again they are labelled "Mosqvwiter" which I assume is meant to refer to them as mamluks. So we have images, some of which are probably of Wallachian and Moldovan calarasi, even though labelled as mamluks, but it is had to tell how many, if any, are by an artist who actually witnessed these cavalry. Some of them are clearly copies of the earlier works.
|
Daniel Hopfer, three Mamluks c.1526-1530 - but are they actually Wallachian cavalry wrongly identified as Mamluks? |
|
Probably a copy of the image above from a codex of costumes - the Códice De Trajes c.1547. Are these Mamluks or Wallachians? This also serves to illustrate how images were clearly copied by other artists. |
This being a Camisado blog post I had to find an excuse to include some woodcuts from Maximilian's Weisskunig! While the two images from it included below may not be of Wallachian or Moldovan troops specifically they do show the fashion for striped tunics among Eastern European troops in this period. Both woodcuts depict various characters and two of them in eastern fashions are clearly in striped clothing. I had intended to avoid the stripes when painting up the miniatures but having found these images I decided at least some of them would have to be painted like this. |
Woodcut from the Weisskunig c.1514-1516. The two gentlemen on the left look to be Eastern European and one wears the distinct striped tunic as shown in the Erhard Schön and Daniel Hopfer images above. The mix of mail and plate armour of the man second from the left is also interesting. |
|
Another woodcut from the Weisskunig c.1514-1516. Again some of the characters depicted look to be Eastern European with the gentleman on the right being in another striped coat. |
These figures have all been converted to show the distinctive beehive fur hats. These were sculpted with green stuff after the hats the figures had been wearing were filed down. The feathers were then added from other miniatures I have converted in the past. Most of the figures are Old Glory Miniatures Balkan light cavalry or Delis whist the captain, carrying a mace, is an Assault Group Figure. Some of the figures carry the shields they originally came with whilst some have been swapped for Perry or Redoubt Enterprises shields. Finally all of the figures are on Assault Group horses instead of the Old Glory ones.
I am pleased with how they have turned out. These cavalrymen fought for both Ottoman and Christian armies during the constant border warfare of this period and they will make a really colourful addition to both my Ottoman and Hungarian armies. They are also useful for a relatively long time period being suitable from the 15th Century through to at least the end of the 16th. These troops would also be great in a 15th century army of Vlad the Impaler and I was tempted to go down the rabbit hole of starting to build an army for Vlad to take on my Ottomans. But that will have to wait for now as there are lots of other projects in the pipeline!
It must be good to have such a unique and unusual unit in your collection. I admire your ability to convert.
ReplyDeleteI confess I am not a fan of the hats and overall look of the historic originals but think that in your execution of them you've done a terrific job.
Their versatility and range of period will make them a very useful addition to your armies. Someone told me that if they were starting again they would have, as a core, troops that covered long periods of history and several armies.
I particularly like the look of the stripes and the banner that declares whose side they are on this week.
Thanks again for sharing such a colourful and detailed post.
Stephen
Thank you Stephen, the calarasi do indeed have quite a unique look, I think that is the reason I was so keen to try and convert a unit of them for the tabletop.
DeleteWith reference to the idea of having core troops that cover longer periods or can be used in several armies that can certainly work for the 16th century. My more generic units, or ones that had a long historical life span, are definitely the ones that end up on the wargames table the most.
You've made a fabulous unit from a road less traveled. Handy too, in that they can fight on either side, or for themselves.
ReplyDeleteThank you, I think they will come in useful for lots of different games - and multiple armies!
DeleteVery nice work and just goes to show, Old Glory figures can scrub up pretty nicely when in the right hands!
ReplyDeleteCheers rross, I know what you mean about the OG figures, they do vary in quality. In fact OG actually do a pack of specific Calarasi - but to my eye the hats on them don't match the contemporary images.
DeleteYou should be very proud of what you have achieved, they are a lovely unit, well done.
ReplyDeleteCheers Robbie, I did enjoy working on these - even painting the stripes wasn't too bad!
DeleteThese have come out really nicely and further add to the sweeping hordes of cavalry you're already able to field. Will look forward to one day be able to play some games with Vlad the Impaler, though appreciate this is some time off.
ReplyDeleteCheers Tom, yes they will make a great addition to the delis and akinji or the hussars and mounted archers. Vlad is a tempting prospect!
DeleteHi just finished my own version in 15mm though a bit more generic using Khurasan Delis and Ottomans with essex eastern shields
ReplyDeleteThose Khurasan 15mm Ottomans are lovely figures - better than some of the 28mm ranges!
DeleteVery very nice Oli! A lovely addition! The beauty of any types like this- whether Wallachians, Transylvanians, Romanians, Hungarians is that they can always be part of, or opponents of, an Ottoman army! .....and I'd love to se you go down that rabbit home of Vlad's Army! Thanks for another great post.
ReplyDeleteThank you John. I agree there is a lot of flexibility with the armies in the Eastern European Ottoman Wars. Vlad may be a way off but I do have a unit of Voynuks I am going to attempt in the next few months, once I have tackled a load of Steel Fist peasants. for the Voynuks my aim is to mix Eastern and Western styles of clothing and armour in one unit.
DeleteBrilliant stuff!
ReplyDeleteI'm currently reading about and prepping an early-to-mid 16th century Polish-Lithuanian force. There is a clear connection between the calarasi you show here, the Greek and Albanian stradiots, and the early hussars (mostly the Serbian ones, called "Racowie" in Polish, as the Hungarian ones seem to be equipped with maille and helmets). All of these are light cavalry from the Balkans, using lances and bows predominantly and distinctively shaped shields. The national headgear may well be the best way to differentiate them all :D
The Polish and Lithuanian armies fought both the Modavians and Wallachians in the period and employed them in their own armies, especially against the Tatars and Muscovites (NB: could the "Mosqvwiter" above refer to Muscovites? they also employed plenty of Southern European men and themselves were an extremely cavalry-heavy army).
Thank you Max - yes you could well be correct the "Mosqvwiter" could indeed refer to Muscovites rather than Mamlukes, that would make a lot more sense.
DeleteI would love to see pictures of your early/mid 16th century Poles and Lithuanians when you start them. Have you seen the 2 units of hussars on this blog? I tried two different takes on them, see http://camisado1500s.blogspot.com/2021/01/early-16th-century-hussars-battle-of.html
and
http://camisado1500s.blogspot.com/2020/11/hussar.html
On the illustration by Daniel Hopfer above you can see that the horseman in the middle has a Serbian coat of arms on his shield. So the horsemen are surely balkanic soldiers in Ottoman service (there is also a crescent on the shield and on the lance) If I am correct, Hopfer made this illustration after Jan Swart's similar picture. Somehow he misunderstood something and identified the soldiers as mamluks despite they have completely differens equipment.
ReplyDeleteYes I agree - they certainly aren't Mamlukes. Its an interesting example of how an image could be copied and altered as the prints spread around Europe.
Delete