Following on from the command groups in my last post here are some infantry for the Hungarian army. While researching this army it has become clear that pavisiers were still an important troop type in Hungarian forces, certainly up until Mohacs in 1526. In his in depth study of the Hungarian military, "From Nicopolis to Mohács - A History of Ottoman-Hungarian Warfare, 1389-1526", Tamás Pálosfalvi states when talking about the army that was defeated at Mohacs: "Secondly, the army contained a considerable number of infantry forces, probably around 10,000. Most of these were recruited in the other Jagiellonian lands, primarily Bohemia and Moravia, the rest raised by the Hungarian lords and nobility but presumably from the same pool of mercenaries. The majority of these footmen, however, were not Swiss- or Landsknecht-type infantry armed with pikes and halberds, but handgunners (commonly referred to as pixidarii in Latin sources and scopetieri in Italian texts) protected by a considerably smaller number of pikemen and pavesiers". Similary Martyn Rady, in his essay "Jagello Hungary", when discussing the preparations earlier on in the campaign states "The muster of troops undertaken in Buda in July 1526, in readiness for the Mohacs campaign, indicates 2,500 hussars and 1,200 heavy cavalry - itself an interesting comment on the relative decline of the heavy cavalry - but then goes on to relate that overall there were 4,000 horse and 3,000 foot, mainly comprising harquebusiers and pikemen. Many of the footsoldiers were equipped with great shields and pavises that were 'as big as a man' as well as with iron-tipped pikes. Most of these were doubtless mercenaries, but we know that nobles also fought as foot soldiers". It was these pavise armed troops that I was keen to recreate for my collection. The issue was what did they look like?
|
Detail of pavisiers marching into action from the "Battle of Orsha, 1514" painting, c.1520-1534. |
|
Another detail from the "Battle of Orsha, 1514" this time showing the same pavisiers in action with arquebusiers behind them. |
Yet again the "Battle of Orsha" painting provided me with inspiration for these figures with its depictions of armoured pavisiers, shown above. This set me on a search for other examples of these troops and it turns out there are some great images of them. Another excellent source is Maximilian's Triumphal Arch, produced in 1515 but printed a few years later. Three of the plates in the arch, shown below, depict Bohemian style infantry both in Maximilian's employ and as his opponents. In the "Expulsion of the Hungarians from Lower Austria" woodcut, illustrating his campaign of 1490, they are depicted fighting alongside Landsknecht. In the image of Maximilian conversing in seven languages some of his soldiers are cleary armed in this style, in fact none of the infantry he is in coversation with in this image seem to be depicted in the classic Landsknecht dress. The Wenzenbach plate from the Triumphal Arch has a superb image of the pavise armed infantry, the front ranks of which are all in deep "German" sallets with bevors protecting their faces. It is interesting to compare this Wenzenbach image with one from a decade or so earlier, also shown below, where the Bohemians in the employ of Ruprecht of the Palatinate are depicted in much lighter armour.
|
"The Expulsion of the Hungarians from Lower Austria", from The Triumphal Arch of Maximilian I - 1515–17 - School of Albrecht Dürer. |
|
Maximilian conversing in seven languages, from The Triumphal Arch. Note the large shields and polearms carried by two of the infantrymen on the left. |
|
Later depicition of Wenzenbach from Maximilian's Triumphal Arch. Is that perhaps a throwing axe shown behind the second pavisier on the right? |
|
Detail from a contemporary image of The Battle of Wenzenbach 1504. |
A final image of interest is
Nikolaus Meldemann's 1529 depiction of a Bohemian Hauptman and his bodyguards, both carrying ahlspiess. From all of these images it is clear that all manner of polearms were carried by these infantrymen, but the ahlspiess seems to have been something of a speciality of theirs. A dusack, a sword with a single edged blade perhaps similar to a falchion, was one of their disctinct weapons which can be seen being carried by one of the bodyguards below. The Bohemians were also known for using throwing axes. If you look carefully at the depicition of Wenzenbach from Maximilian's Triumphal Arch it looks like one of the figures behind the four pavisiers is indeed about to throw a short hafted axe. |
Bohemian Hauptman and bodyguards with ahlspiess, Nikolaus Meldemann 1529. |
|
The Bohemian infantry. |
The problem was how to build units of these infantry for the wargames table? No manufacturer makes these specific troops. Modelling them on the images discussed I was keen to have the troops armed with a wide variety of polearms as well as the pavises. It does seem like some of these troops may have only carried the pavise, and perhaps a sidearm, but in an attempt to replicate the troops shown in the above images I wanted them armed with glaives, ahlspiess, spears and halberds. I decided to use a couple of different standing pikemen and command packs from The Assault Groups Italian and Spanish early Renaissance range. Once their heads were swapped with Perry plastic sallets and they were armed with a whole variety of polearms from various manufacturers I felt they would look the part. I worked on a few sample figures which turned out well before committing to building the whole force.
Another big issue was how to do the pavises. Anyone who has read this blog for a while will no I loathe painting shields and heraldic details of any kind! As part of their Hussite range 1st Corps make some lovely pavises and Little Big Men studios make some incredibly detailed transfers to go with them. Initially I wasn't keen to use these as I wanted specifically Hungarian infantry for the army and I also felt that many of the designs were simply too "Hussite" or "Taborite" to fit in. As I looked further into the Hungarian army of this period it became clear that Bohemians fought in their thousands in the army, the Jagiellonian monarchs also being Kings of Bohemia. It is clear that they still followed their Hussite faith, to such an extent that when Ruprecht of the Palatinate hired an army of Bohemian mercenaries to face Maximilian in the Landshut War of Succession, 1503-1505, Maximilian was able to use this as a pretext to claim money from the Papacy and offer Crusading indulgences to those taking part! Based on this I have used the Hussite transfers, but have still tried to put the more overtly Hussite ones in the rear rank.
The decision to have two ranks of pavises was based on a few things. It makes the line look really solid and also gives some depth, similar to the contemporary images. I also wanted to be able to use the figures either with handgunners and crossbowen behind them, as shown in the photos, but also possibly in units of their own, maybe for assaulting fortified positions as they seem to be doing in "The Expulsion of the Hungarians from Lower Austria" woodcut shown above. When placed in file the double ranks also give an effective marching look, similar to one of the depictions of the pavisiers in the Orsha painting.
They are shown below in the service of Hungary with my generic pikemen, arquebusiers and crossbowmen placed behind them. The project involved 72 miniatures, pavises and transfers. They were armed with 72 polearms, 5 of which used a plastic rondel from the Perry plastic Wars of the Roses kits to turn a simple spear into an ahlspiess. Of the 72 miniatures used 63 had headswaps to make them more suitable as Bohemian infantry, with lots of sallets and kettle hats being used. This means that to make 12 bases of the pavisiers required 356 components. Not a project I would undertake again lightly! They may not be perfect, I have nagging worries that too many French and English style sallets were used and that the transfers may be a little too early but as with my Ottomans I have had to make a few compromises as no manufacturer makes a specific range for early 16th century Hungarians or Bohemians. Despite this I like the overall solid look they give and the headgear really helps to get the right feel for the unit. The faces of nearly all the front rank of infantry are covered matching the Triumphal Arch woodcuts.
Lots of photos of them are below. Not only are they useful for the Hungarian army but they can also be used for the Landshut War of Succession to face my early Landsknecht and Men at Arms. Now to get planning a refight of Wenzenbach...
|
28mm Bohemian Infantry for the early 16th century. |
|
Another unit of Bohemian infantry. |
|
Bohemians in Hungarian service. |
|
The pikemen wait behind the pavisiers and arquebusiers. |
|
A wall of pavises. |
|
The double ranking of the pavisiers means that they can be put into a marching formation as above. This reminds me of the image of the pavisiers arriving on the battlefield in the Orsha painting. |
|
Detail of a heavily armoured Bohemian with a much lighter armed comrade forming the second rank. |
|
A view of one of the units from the rear showing the lighter armed infantry. |
|
Another view of units from behind showing the arquebusiers at the ready. |
|
Infantry armed with pavises shield the arquebusiers and crossbowmen. |
|
The solid ranks of pavisiers. |
As always, very interesting to read your thoughts and sources! And nice result, by the way :)
ReplyDeleteCheers Jaeckel, the sources for this have been a real inspiration.
DeleteWow, I learned alot from this post. And they look great. I was honestly Wondering how the Bohemian/Hassite form of war had evolved into the 16th century.
ReplyDeleteThank you, yes I found it interesting how the Hussite style of warfare was marketed out to other rulers with Bohemians being employed by lots of other states.
DeleteIt really is interesting and kind of surprising. I mean with with the German Landsknecht, and Swiss in the style hogging the limelight. That the pavisiers heavy troops with a gun line still held sway in the east.
DeleteFigured it would have changed more once the black army was disbanded. But nope, it held on and was still effective.
I think they got shown up at Wenzenbach in 1504 when Maximilian with his Landsknecht, Men-at-Arms, Civic Militia and artillery destroyed a whole army of Bohemian Mercenaries. After that they lost a lot of prestige.
DeleteThey were certainly still around into the late 1520s though, especially further east - some were hired to help crush the Peasants Revolt in Germany. What is telling about this is that there was a shortage of Landsknecht available as thousands were campaigning in Italy and some had sided with the peasants, so the Bohemians were obviously not the German authorities first choice!
Well, they all get shown up in the end. Innovation, tech, training change and all that.
DeleteStill I will have to look that battle up.
And I does make a lot of sense to bring in Bohemian marcs given the problems of the Peasants revolt as well. Not enough local troops, and the locals loyalties are suspect. Henry VIII did the same thing in the northern revolts, if memory serves.
Stunning brushwork and impressive research!
ReplyDeleteCheers Stryker
DeleteGreat looking forces of an unusual army plus I love all the research you put into your projects.
ReplyDeleteCheers, I hope to get some pictures of the whole army with Hussars and Gendarmes up soon.
DeleteAn all round gold mine of information & exquisite modelling! Inspiring stuff chum!
ReplyDeleteThank you, this was a fun project to research and attempt to recreate how the Bohemians looked.
DeleteGreat stuff Oli. Should be more Hungarian stuff about as their very colourful and interesting army for Medieval and Renaissance periods. Bit of inspiration to get on with my Armigeri.
ReplyDeleteCheers Hendrid, I agree the Hungarian army for this period is really varied, I would love to see a manufacturer do some minis for it even if it wasn't a complete range!
DeleteTruly awe inspiring stuff Oli
ReplyDeleteCheers Stuart, it was a fair bit of work but they will look great on the battlefield.
DeleteReally impressive research and colorful realization! Fantastic
ReplyDeleteThank you Ratmaul, they are quite an unusual unit for the 16th century.
DeleteI've been following the development of your Hungarian army with interest and envy, but the Bohemian infantry are the pinnacle in my opinion. Superb. I've been slowly building medieval and renaissance Hungarian armies over the past year or so. Feeling very inspired by your latest blog. So much so, that I immediately searched for and bought Palosfavli's book. Thanks
ReplyDeleteThank you Centenary. That is a brave move with Palosfavli's book as it is not cheap! I managed to borrow a copy and it has a wealth of detail on the 15th century campaigns. I had no idea how extensively the forces of Matthias Corvinus were involved in wars against different opponents. For Mohacs I didnt feel it has as much information. Its the most comprehensive book on the campaigns of later Medieval Hungary I have found though.
DeleteAwesome conversion work, exhaustive research and a splendid looking unit,really impressive!
ReplyDeleteBest Iain
Cheers Iain, it was fun working on something so unusual.
DeleteThose are marvelous! I have to ask - did you have the Perry heads lying about, or were you able to source them as bits?
ReplyDeleteCheers fireymonkeyboy.
DeleteThat is a good question about the head swaps. I bought one plastic kit of the Perry mounted men at arms just to ensure I had enough deep sallets and sallets with bevors but otherwise I sourced the heads from a mate who builds hundreds of Perry Wars of the Roses figures and gives me the left over sprues and Stuart also donated a nice selection of heads with sallets.
Wow. Those look superb. The transfers make the pavises look *amazing*.
ReplyDeleteRegards, James
Thank you James, the transfers were quite a bit of work but I am pleased with the results.
DeleteFascianting research and wonderful minis - love the pavise designs 👍
ReplyDeleteThank you, yes those pavise transfers are great - they saved me the horror of trying to paint designs on them myself
DeleteI was just looking at the "Battle of Orsha, 1514" photo again. And noticed the heavy armored men at arms or foot knights fighting ahead of the shield wall. Just thinking that might be a interesting skermish line to add in front of a troops of heavy shields.
ReplyDeleteInteresting that you mention them as I am pretty sure they are one of the parts of the painting that probably isnt very accurate. They seem to be in foot tournament armour rather than field harness, it is unlikely those armoured tonlets were worn on foot in the field, this article ( http://archiv.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/artdok/3363/1/Zygulski_The_Battle_of_Orsha_1979.pdf ) on the details of the battle states this about them:
Delete"Seven heavily armoured soldiers (modular group) two of
whom wear armour skirts or tonlets extending to the knees. Used chiefly in Germany for tournament combat on foot, this is surely artistic licence,sińce it would seem to have been pointless to take such unwieldy and
unmilitary armour into battle in the steppes and marshes of Russia. The first of these soldiers, in an armet with raised visor, is fighting with an eel-spear, the second, in a closed bicoque helm (normally also tournament
armour), wields a winged spear (Appendix XIII). The other five men stand between the cannons, perhaps as defenders; they a wielding various types of pole-arms"
I am really not sure on these chaps - maybe they did bring tournament armour to the battle? It's hard to say!
So one of those artistic license things. The artist might not have ever been to a battle so just drew what he knew. And that was the army of the blocks fighting in the local festival.
DeleteI just thought, maybe its supposed to represent men sallying out on the wings to fight under the protection of the pike, shields an guns. Just pushed to the front of the battle line, instead of on the flanks.
Hard to show that in those form of art, with a complete battle on one peace of canvases I guess.
They could well be soldiers sallying out, that does make sense. The wierd thing about the accuracy of the painting is that in many ways it probably is accurate. It follows contemporary accounts of the battle, it's done like a kind of cartoon depiciting various stages of the event, and the artist is thought to have painted himself in the picture, like an early war correspondent, have a look here: https://alchetron.com/cdn/battle-of-orsha-painting-fe50559d-bd4a-4c7b-82da-d9937e085c5-resize-750.jpg
DeleteThat is believed to be the artist.
The inclusion of the tournament style armour is puzzling!
Oh that is interesting. Well Maybe it was a case of some armor is better then no armor, and some men@arms only had tournament kit. But wanted to fight as well.
DeleteThat's what I would put my money on.
If its not a after the fact armor just used as a stand in model. Kind of like how lots of war art in the 19th century would have propaganda with solders in full dress uniforms fighting each other. Even if that was not the uniform of the day.
Still even if it is all artistic license still find it interesting.
Splendid work mr Oli!!!! may i ask, where did you find this woodcut of maximilian speaking the seven languages? I've never seen it before!!!.
ReplyDeletethanks beforehand.
Thank you Octavio, the image is from the Triumphal Arch of Maximilian, if you enlarge this image you can see it in the centre of the far left pillar: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/cf/Albrecht_D%C3%BCrer_-_The_Triumphal_Arch_of_Maximilian_%28NGA_1991.200.1%29.jpg
DeleteIncredible!!!!! thanks a lot trully.
DeleteMost helpful. I´m around building the two side of Mohacs for Impetus and this is great information.
ReplyDeleteThank you João, I would love to see pictures of the armies when they are ready.
Delete